Data Analysis
There is a multitude of research, theory and just simple opinions on how often and why police brutality occurs but the most important viewpoint is that from the police officers themselves. Aaron Woodruff is a Major and acting Chief of Police in the Illinois State University Police Department and was gracious enough to provide some answers to some very important questions. To begin, Major Woodruff explained how he began his career with the ISU Police Department and has ever since been working in Normal. He believes he is a police officer now because he enjoys helping others and isn’t fit for a job that is the same everyday therefore he says “police work just felt like a natural fit for me.” With a focus being on the relationship between minorities and city police officers; when asked if the academy has any cultural diversity training, he replied that the academy does include a cultural awareness class along with mental health and elder abuse issues programs. Also, officers attend additional diversity training and most have completed online courses through the Southern Poverty Law Center and University of California at San Bernadino. With all of this in mind, Major Woodruff concluded, “While I think this type of training has some effect, I think personal experience is by far the better teacher.” Being in Normal, it would be interesting to see whether the Major has felt mistrust or negative attitudes towards himself from minority members so I asked him and he replied, “Absolutely, over the years I have heard remarks by minority members about myself and other officers that were absolutely untrue.” He goes on to say, “sometimes you need to let people vent their frustrations, even if they are not valid.” This is important because it is aggravating for anybody to be wrongfully accused of something especially for police officers who are trying to help the accusers. Major Woodruff believes, from his experience in the field, that the reasons for excessive use of force by police officers includes “long work hours by the officer, poor officer selection, poor training, escalation in force by the arrestee, pre-conceived biases, family life stressors, or a number of other factors.” His answer to the problem is obviously not definitive but he believes that open and long-term communication between community members and police is the best way to increase understanding about what both sides are trying to achieve.
In an effort to juxtapose this with a large urban city setting, I also interviewed Officer Joseph Meloscia, an undercover narcotics officer working with the Chicago Police Department. When Joe went through the academy he attended a short version of a course of cultural diversity and every 2 years has to go through a refresher course. This is interesting because it seems that Normal police officers go through more diversity training than Chicago officers although Chicago is obviously the more diverse of the two cities. Like Major Woodruff, Officer Meloscia always experiences mistrust from the minority members he works with. He reiterates by saying “Many people see police in their homes at a young age. The image of police officers arresting one or both of their parents leaves a bad taste.” Officer Meloscia believed a major reason of police brutality to be long, exhausting hours on the streets. This year, Chicago changed officer work weeks from four days to six days with an hour and half extra each day. Joe adds that studies have shown that on the sixth work day is when most complaints about excessive use of police force occur. He also believes that problems at home are a contributor; “getting into an argument with a spouse just before leaving for work and then the first person you come into contact with becomes an easy target.” Officer Meloscia believes that the way to reduce police brutality is to keep kids and drugs off the streets and put into better schools and work.
A theme that is most surprising and stands out most is the criticism of both Officers’ co-workers and the language used in their answers. Both interviewees did not hesitate to say that there are still problems with corruption and racism within the police force. The strongest message came from Officer Meloscia in which he said, “There’s no doubt that many officers are heavy-handed or racist.” What is surprising about this statement is the definitive nature of it and the fact that “many” officers are racist in his opinion. Another interesting point to make about both of the officer’s viewpoints was the attribution of blame for police brutality towards long work hours. Both officers mentioned it but Officer Meloscia went further to explain it. A difference between the two was the fact that Officer Meloscia saw a solution to police brutality being a problem that the government needs to work on to keep kids and gangs off the streets. Officer Woodruff believed the solution to be not enough open communication between the police and the community they serve.
The next source of data comes from the analysis of media reports on police brutality of urban areas and the ratio of citizen complaints to these actual reported cases. In a journal called the “Revolutionary Worker,” a startling statistic was revealed which stated “from 1993 to 1995, the Chicago Police Department’s Office of Professional Standards looked into 8,620 citizen’s complaints. During that same period, only 13 cops were fired for brutality (Revolutionary Worker).” Although there may be some frivolous complaints, it is no reason for only one officer to be relieved of his duty for every 660 complaints of abuse. Referring to the 2009 annual report from the Chicago Police Department, there were a total of 726 complaints against police officers for unreasonable force and of those, only 20 were met with disciplinary procedures. Those procedures can range from a reprimand, suspension or separation from the Chicago Police Department (2009 Annual Report: A Year in Review, 66). In relation to this, media reports of unreasonable force by police are extremely limited in comparison with the number of complaints received. In 2009, the Chicago Tribune published only 13 articles on different instances of police brutality in the city of Chicago with three articles describing the beating of handicapped individuals. It is clear that in the crime, law and justice section of the Chicago Tribune that only the most extreme of cases will be published. Also, the Chicago Sun-Times published only three articles regarding police brutality or torture in 2009.
It is impossible to definitively conclude why the exposure is so limited compared to the amount of complaints of brutality but there are a couple of possible reasons. First of all, a newspaper can only report a limited amount of stories and focusing on minor cases of abuse is obviously not the priority for a business. Secondly, like any other subject a newspaper reports about, only the most special and outlandish cases seem to interest the readers so reporting about officers brutalizing a handicapped person is more important than verbal insults on the streets.